Inputs to agree
- The channels and tools involved
- The information you need to qualify a request
- A named person or team for follow-up
Six areas for a conversation about AI implementation and managed operations. Each starts with the work, the information and the person responsible.
An enquiry arrives through a website, inbox or another agreed channel. The useful first step is to capture the request and establish who should review it.
Discuss this workflowYour team decides whether the request is a fit and which response is appropriate.
Test incomplete requests, duplicate enquiries, routing failures and the handoff to a person before any pilot is approved.
Routine questions can start with an agreed set of source material. Unclear, sensitive or unsupported requests need a visible route to a person.
Discuss this workflowYour team handles exceptions, complaints and decisions that fall outside the approved information.
Check answer accuracy, source freshness, unanswered questions and whether the escalation contains enough context.
A voice workflow needs a defined purpose: gather a message, explain an agreed process or route a call. Hours, languages and any booking access need to be established first.
Discuss this workflowA person handles requests outside the agreed scope and any decision the caller needs to confirm with your team.
Evaluate recognition, language quality, interruptions, failed connections and transfer behavior with representative calls.
Start with the documents your team is allowed to use and the questions they need to answer. Access rules and visible sources belong in the design from the beginning.
Discuss this workflowA person checks ambiguous or consequential answers and decides when the source material needs updating.
Test retrieval relevance, citations, permissions and the response when information is missing or contradictory.
Map the manual work between tools before proposing an integration. Some steps can be deterministic; others need a person to approve a change.
Discuss this workflowA person approves consequential actions and has a clear way to pause, correct or reverse a workflow where feasible.
Test permissions, duplicate events, failures, retries and audit information against an agreed acceptance checklist.
Agree which languages, channels and types of message matter. Tone, terminology and review requirements need to be tested for the actual workflow.
Discuss this workflowA suitable person reviews sensitive, ambiguous or high-consequence communication before it is used.
Evaluate meaning, names, terminology, tone and handoff quality with representative material in each agreed language.
Describe the work, the tools and the point where your team needs help. Scope and arrangements can be discussed from there.